Page MenuHomePhabricator

Added abc-sync-chain test to ensure node doesn't seize while syncing many blocks
ClosedPublic

Authored by jasonbcox on Dec 13 2018, 00:18.

Details

Summary

As part of investigating test flakiness in abc-parkedchain.py, I noticed a
severe lack of test coverage for nodes syncing many out-of-order blocks, both in and
out of IBD. This test provides that explicit coverage so that further development
on parking blocks does not cause nodes to periodically seize while syncing.

Test Plan

Run multiple times:
for i in {1..100}; do ./test_runner.py abc-sync-chain; done

Diff Detail

Repository
rABC Bitcoin ABC
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Fabien requested changes to this revision.Dec 13 2018, 14:55
Fabien added inline comments.
test/functional/abc-sync-chain.py
12 ↗(On Diff #6334)

Not required

15 ↗(On Diff #6334)

Could you whether remove the parenthesis or use it everywhere when there is no line break involved ?

43 ↗(On Diff #6334)

I would advise you to use the new format() method, like this:
"-minimumchainwork={:#x}".format(202 + 2 * NUM_IBD_BLOCKS)
which is intended to replace the % string format

44 ↗(On Diff #6334)

Shouldn't it be 200 + NUM_IBD_BLOCKS to have half the blocks during IBD and half the blocks outside of IBD ?

51 ↗(On Diff #6334)

This can be simplified:
node0conn.add_connection(NodeConn('127.0.0.1', p2p_port(0), self.nodes[0], node0conn))

81 ↗(On Diff #6334)

blocks[len(blocks) - 1] => blocks[-1]

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Dec 13 2018, 14:55
test/functional/abc-sync-chain.py
44 ↗(On Diff #6334)

I ran the test with NUM_IBD_BLOCKS set at 50 and got 404 chainwork at the end of the test. From this, I figured the chainwork per block was 2.

jasonbcox marked 5 inline comments as done.

Updated according to feedback

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Dec 23 2018, 14:10
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.