- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
May 23 2025
feedback
May 22 2025
make comment a proper sentence
May 21 2025
May 20 2025
there is a debbuging true || that needs removing
update
Suggested test plan:
May 19 2025
fix copied comment
May 16 2025
Tested with an address that initially has confirmed transactions, then receives a mempool transaction, then a new block gets mined: all 3 hashes are identical with Chronik and Fulcrum.
Actually I'm only getting the same result for a single tx in the mempool. When the block is mined the status differs.
I imagine that Chronik does not guarantee that the transaction history is ordered in the same order as inside the block.
I'm now getting the same results with Fulcrum and Chronik, with the expected exception of histories containing transactions with unconfirmed parents.
markdown fix for url
add a paragraph for chronik vs assumeutxo incompatibility
remove block date in comment
May 15 2025
utack
May 14 2025
May 13 2025
we can only pass "-chronik" if chronik is compiled. Unfortunately there is no convenient way to start the node only if chronik is compiled, so start it with no params if we are not going to run that test.
Add a couple of chronik calls to better check that chronik was succesfully started.
optional suggestions. The bytes flipping + explicit byteorder specification hurts my brain.
May 12 2025
@bot build-tsan
@bot build-tsan
@bot build-tsan
looks good. Tested on mainnet, results are identical to electrum.bitcoinabc.org