Change Details

33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f3539ac6d772fc646b5f184fa1efe77bf632f6a test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack) 1388de83900eaced906d369fe9e8887ae74b2dcf rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack) 2ee0cb3330ccf70f0540cb42370796e32eff1569 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack) 8d1ed0c263f8cdff7189f02040b5d02238d93da0 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack) 5a0ed850700dfb19167d40b38f80313bd5e427ca rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack) 70cda342cd20d0e0cd9f28405457544036968f2d rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892. Main motivations: - There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address. - `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers. Changes by order of commits: - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content - [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman - [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32 - [x] add getaddressinfo code docs - [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py - [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests Here are gists of the CLI help output: [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810) [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba) It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._ --- Depends on D7716 Backport of Core PR17283

33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f3539ac6d772fc646b5f184fa1efe77bf632f6a test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack) 1388de83900eaced906d369fe9e8887ae74b2dcf rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack) 2ee0cb3330ccf70f0540cb42370796e32eff1569 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack) 8d1ed0c263f8cdff7189f02040b5d02238d93da0 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack) 5a0ed850700dfb19167d40b38f80313bd5e427ca rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack) 70cda342cd20d0e0cd9f28405457544036968f2d rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892. Main motivations: - There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address. - `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers. Changes by order of commits: - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content - [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman - [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32 - [x] add getaddressinfo code docs - [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py - [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests Here are gists of the CLI help output: [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810) [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba) It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._ --- Depends on D7716 Backport of Core [[https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283 | PR17283]]

33f5fc32e5bfbe1e89c4d20ce455bcc6dc194151 test: add rpc getaddressinfo labels test coverage (Jon Atack) 0f3539ac6d772fc646b5f184fa1efe77bf632f6a test: add listlabels test in wallet_labels.py (Jon Atack) 1388de83900eaced906d369fe9e8887ae74b2dcf rpc: add getaddressinfo code documentation (Jon Atack) 2ee0cb3330ccf70f0540cb42370796e32eff1569 rpc: update getaddressinfo RPCExamples to bech32 (Jon Atack) 8d1ed0c263f8cdff7189f02040b5d02238d93da0 rpc: clarify label vs labels in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman (Jon Atack) 5a0ed850700dfb19167d40b38f80313bd5e427ca rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content (Jon Atack) 70cda342cd20d0e0cd9f28405457544036968f2d rpc: improve getaddressinfo RPCHelpman formatting (Jon Atack) Pull request description: This PR is a continuation of the work in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12892. Main motivations: - There is currently no test coverage for the getaddressinfo `labels` response. Coverage here is a prerequisite before deprecating the `label` response or adding multiple labels per address. - `bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` returns a few content errors, difficult-to-read formatting, and no explanation why it returns both `label` and `labels` and how they relate, which can be confusing for application developers. Changes by order of commits: - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman layout formatting - [x] improve/fix getaddressinfo RPCHelpman content - [x] clarify the `label` and `labels` fields in getaddressinfo RPCHelpman - [x] update getaddressinfo RPCExamples addresses to bech32 - [x] add getaddressinfo code docs - [x] add a `listlabels` test assertion in wallet_labels.py - [x] add missing getaddressinfo `labels` test coverage and improve the existing `label` tests Here are gists of the CLI help output: [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` before this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/022af5221a85c069780359a22643c810) [`bitcoin-cli help getaddressinfo` after this PR](https://gist.github.com/jonatack/4ee5f6abc62a3d99269570206a5f90ba) It seems we ought to begin a deprecation process for the getaddressinfo `label` field? If yes, I have a follow-up ready. _--> EDIT: Deprecation follow-ups #17578 and #17585 now build on this PR._ --- Depends on D7716 Backport of Core [[https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283 | PR17283]]