At the time when
```cpp
pnode->vProcessMsg.splice(pnode->vProcessMsg.end(), pnode->vRecvMsg, pnode->vRecvMsg.begin(), it);
```
is called, `it` is certainly `pnode->vRecvMsg.end()` which makes the
call equivalent to:
```cpp
pnode->vProcessMsg.splice(pnode->vProcessMsg.end(), pnode->vRecvMsg, pnode->vRecvMsg.begin(), pnode->vRecvMsg.end());
```
which is equivalent to:
```cpp
pnode->vProcessMsg.splice(pnode->vProcessMsg.end(), pnode->vRecvMsg);
```
Thus, use the latter. Further, maybe irrelevant, but the latter has
constant complexity while the original code is `O(length of vRecvMsg)`.
This is a backport of core#26888
Depends on D18243