Page MenuHomePhabricator

[website] Add blog post about Avalanche Post-Consensus
ClosedPublic

Authored by Mengerian on Sep 28 2022, 20:41.

Details

Summary

Explains why different types of user (exchanges, miners) should care

Test Plan

Ran it locally, read it and tested the links

Diff Detail

Repository
rABCWEB Bitcoin ABC Website
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Mengerian retitled this revision from [website] Add blog post about Avalanche POst-Consensus to [website] Add blog post about Avalanche Post-Consensus.

Fix typo in commit message

bytesofman added a subscriber: bytesofman.
bytesofman added inline comments.
_posts/2022-09-28-avalanche-post-consensus.md
48 ↗(On Diff #35268)

typo/rephrasing "this will bring satisfaction to customers value fast deposits"

suggested alt:

This will enhance exchange security by preventing re-org attacks and increase customer satisfaction by reducing deposit confirmation times. This will also enable easier arbitrage for traders, driving more volume and liquidity to the exchange.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Sep 28 2022, 21:20
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 28 2022, 23:43
Klakurka added inline comments.
_posts/2022-09-28-avalanche-post-consensus.md
27 ↗(On Diff #35270)
89–90 ↗(On Diff #35270)

Basically a repeat of what's in the 3rd paragraph.

4 ↗(On Diff #35268)
20 ↗(On Diff #35268)
aimal added inline comments.
_posts/2022-09-28-avalanche-post-consensus.md
67 ↗(On Diff #35270)

typo: technologies

Mengerian marked 5 inline comments as done.

Address review feedback, and other fixes

_posts/2022-09-28-avalanche-post-consensus.md
89–90 ↗(On Diff #35270)

OK, I just removed the whole paragraph.