prevector's move assignment and move constructor were not noexcept, which makes it inefficient to use inside STL containers like std::vector. That's the case e.g. for CScriptCheck. This PR adds noexcept, and also implements the move assignment & ctor, which makes it quite a bit more efficient to use prevector in an std::vector.
The PR also adds a benchmark which grows an std::vector by adding prevector objects to it.
Adds a few static_asserts so CScriptCheck stays is_nothrow_move_assignable, is_nothrow_move_constructible, and is_nothrow_destructible
As can be seen, mostly thanks to just noexcept the benchmark becomes about 2 times faster because std::vector can now use move operations instead of having to fall back to copy everything
Before:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 7,518.17 | 133,011.17 | 0.3% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectNontrivial` | 964.99 | 1,036,278.31 | 0.9% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectTrivial` | 21,728.31 | 46,022.91 | 0.1% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectNontrivial` | 10,878.14 | 91,927.52 | 0.9% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectTrivial`
After:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 3,659.77 | 273,241.27 | 0.2% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectNontrivial` | 655.16 | 1,526,333.89 | 0.5% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorDirectTrivial` | 7,934.76 | 126,027.76 | 0.3% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectNontrivial` | 3,050.25 | 327,841.59 | 0.2% | 0.01 | `PrevectorFillVectorIndirectTrivial`
This is a backport of core#27334