[avalanche] Fix the abc_p2p_proof_inventory test
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by Fabien on Jun 18 2021, 06:33.

Details

Reviewers

deadalnix

Group Reviewers

Restricted Project

Maniphest Tasks

Restricted Maniphest Task

Commits

rABCdca56be2c6bd: [avalanche] Fix the abc_p2p_proof_inventory test

Summary

The test can fail under some condition because it waits for a proof to
become orphaned by waiting for the proof to be known by the node then
asserting its orphan state. But the proof is already known valid before
this call, so it is possible that the assertion fails because the proof
has not be oprhaned yet.
This diff fixes the test by waiting for the proof to turn orphan.

Ref T1611.

Test Plan

ninja check-functional

Diff Detail

Repository

rABC Bitcoin ABC

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Fabien created this revision.Jun 18 2021, 06:33

Herald added a reviewer: Restricted Project. · View Herald TranscriptJun 18 2021, 06:33

Fabien requested review of this revision.Jun 18 2021, 06:33

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B16033: Diff 28949.Jun 18 2021, 06:44

deadalnix requested changes to this revision.Jun 18 2021, 15:26

deadalnix added a subscriber: deadalnix.

deadalnix added inline comments.

test/functional/test_framework/avatools.py
142 ↗	(On Diff #28949)	bool args are generally a smell. in this case you get around it by using named arguments, which is good, but that means you should put it at the end.
151 ↗	(On Diff #28949)	This will wait forever in case of failure. If the proof has the wrong state, then it must be an error right away. If some event is supposed to trigger a state change, like a reorg, then the proper way to handle this is to wait on the reorg to happen, then check for the proof.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Jun 18 2021, 15:26

Fabien planned changes to this revision.Jun 21 2021, 07:45

Fabien added inline comments.

test/functional/test_framework/avatools.py
151 ↗	(On Diff #28949)	That makes sense but it defeats my use case, which is to wait for a proof to turn orphan while being already known by the node. I will do the fix a bit differently because `wait_for_proof` is not exactly what I need, and update this one to only do the code simplification as a follow-up.