Explanation and steps to help people generate the own Stake Proofs and run an Avalanche-enable node
Details
Details
- Reviewers
PiRK Fabien - Group Reviewers
Restricted Project - Commits
- rABCWEB9462b98de5bf: [website] Add Tutorial for Avalanche Staking
Helped people actually go through the steps, fixed parts that tripped them up
Ran the site locally, read it and checked links.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rABCWEB Bitcoin ABC Website
- Branch
- staking-tutorial
- Lint
No Lint Coverage - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 19955 Build 39614: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
| _posts/2022-09-06-avalanche-staking-tutorial.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52 ↗ | (On Diff #34839) | |
| 78 ↗ | (On Diff #34839) | The menu item is capitalized as of Electrum ABC 5.1.5 "Avalanche Proof Editor" |
| 109 ↗ | (On Diff #34839) | Because of the payout address bug fixed in 5.1.5, we should add a 2b: check again all fields after loading the proof, and adjust parameters if necessary (but don't touch the master_pub or expiration time) step, or alternatively update this doc to mention 5.1.5 as the minimum required version for Electrum ABC. The bug will affect users who customized the payout address during Step 1 (skeleton proof generation): the address will be reset to the default one generated by the proof wallet. |
| 129 ↗ | (On Diff #34839) | How verbose are the avalanche debugging logs? Should we mention that users should periodically deleted their debug.log file to avoid filling the disk space? |
| _posts/2022-09-06-avalanche-staking-tutorial.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52 ↗ | (On Diff #34839) | bullet is missing |
| _posts/2022-09-06-avalanche-staking-tutorial.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 129 ↗ | (On Diff #34839) | The log is limited to 1G by default and will override itself like a circular buffer after it reached the limit |
| _posts/2022-09-07-avalanche-staking-tutorial.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 153 ↗ | (On Diff #34857) | Depends on the expected timing, but would it make sense to request 0.26.x instead ? Because node operators will need to upgrade anyway. |
| 161 ↗ | (On Diff #34857) | I will remove this at this stage of the doc, or add a comment like # See details below |