@dordle In this revision, the modifications that were committed were automatically reflected. A node that implements an appropriate policy will not be required to address numerous invalid in-mempool transactions; rather, it will only be impacted by double-spends until the node receives the corresponding finalized transaction and can cease processing the problematic one.

In D15628#374171, @wardtophat wrote:

@dordle In this revision, the modifications that were committed were automatically reflected. A node that implements an appropriate policy will not be required to address numerous invalid in-mempool transactions; rather, it will only be impacted by double-spends until the node receives the corresponding finalized transaction and can cease processing the problematic one.

@cheap travel destinations 2025 The modifications that were committed are automatically reflected across the network. A node that enforces the appropriate policy will not need to address numerous invalid transactions in the mempool. Instead, the node will only be impacted by double-spends, and only until it receives the finalized transaction

@escape road A node that enforces the appropriate policy will only need to handle valid transactions in the mempool. The node will only be affected by double-spends until it receives the finalized transaction.