BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by deadalnix on May 24 2018, 12:51.

Details

Reviewers

Group Reviewers

Restricted Project

Commits

rSTAGING3dba12fd7627: Use hasData/hasUndo instead of masking with BLOCK_HAVE_DATA/BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO
rABC3dba12fd7627: Use hasData/hasUndo instead of masking with BLOCK_HAVE_DATA/BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO

Summary

As per title.

Depends on D1450

Test Plan

make check

Diff Detail

Repository

rABC Bitcoin ABC

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

deadalnix created this revision.May 24 2018, 12:51

Herald added a reviewer: Restricted Project. · View Herald TranscriptMay 24 2018, 12:51

Build Bitcoin-ABC :: Diffs :: Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.

Build Bitcoin-ABC :: Diffs :: Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B2632: Diff 3960.May 24 2018, 13:27

schancel accepted this revision.May 24 2018, 21:30

schancel added a subscriber: schancel.

schancel added inline comments.

src/validation.cpp
5084 ↗	(On Diff #3960)	lolwut

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 24 2018, 21:30

Closed by commit rABC3dba12fd7627: Use hasData/hasUndo instead of masking with BLOCK_HAVE_DATA/BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO (authored by deadalnix). · Explain WhyMay 25 2018, 15:55

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

src/

chain.h

11 lines

net_processing.cpp

14 lines

rest.cpp

2 lines

rpc/

blockchain.cpp

5 lines

validation.cpp

33 lines

wallet/

wallet.cpp

3 lines

Diff 3996

View Options

src/chain.h

View Options

src/net_processing.cpp

View Options

src/rest.cpp

View Options

src/rpc/blockchain.cpp

View Options

src/validation.cpp

View Options

Use hasData/hasUndo instead of masking with BLOCK_HAVE_DATA/BLOCK_HAVE_UNDOClosedPublicActions

Details

Diff Detail

Event Timeline

Revision ContentsChangeset List

Diff 3996

src/chain.h

src/net_processing.cpp

src/rest.cpp

src/rpc/blockchain.cpp

src/validation.cpp

src/wallet/wallet.cpp

Use hasData/hasUndo instead of masking with BLOCK_HAVE_DATA/BLOCK_HAVE_UNDO
ClosedPublic
Actions

Revision Contents
Changeset List