Backport PR499 from practicalswift
Details
Details
- Reviewers
schancel - Group Reviewers
Restricted Project - Commits
- rSTAGING2fd74f214029: [secp256k1] Make sure we get the requested number of bytes from /dev/urandom
rABC2fd74f214029: [secp256k1] Make sure we get the requested number of bytes from /dev/urandom
ninja check-secp256k1
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rABC Bitcoin ABC
- Branch
- secpdevurandom
- Lint
Lint Passed - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 2261 Build 2664: Bitcoin ABC Buildbot (legacy) Build 2663: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
nothing wrong with the diff, but wasn't secp256k1 handled as a subtree? is this changed since @tomtomtom7's utxo commitments patches?
Comment Actions
The D1072 UTXO patches certainly deviate from upstream as it is not accepted there. But I would think you can still pull updates using a subtree if needed? The deviation is mostly new files and conflicts are unlikely.