We already have activation specifications, this is redundant.
Depends on D17597.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
Mengerian - Group Reviewers
Restricted Project - Commits
- rABC8379d6a7bf1a: [doc] Rename some spec file to remove the activation date
Read the docs. All. Carefully.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rABC Bitcoin ABC
- Branch
- rename_standards
- Lint
Lint Passed - Unit
No Test Coverage - Build Status
Event Timeline
| doc/standards/cashaddr.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 196 | This one should actually stay the same | |
| doc/standards/op_return-prefix-guideline.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 ↗ | (On Diff #52412) | Seems like this link may be meant to refer to the original BCH document on purpose. |
| 33 ↗ | (On Diff #52412) | Ditto |
| modules/ecashaddrjs/README.md | ||
| 7 ↗ | (On Diff #52412) | Was the point of this to say that it's also compliant with BCH Cashaddr, in addition to XEC? In that case, the original link might make sense |
| modules/ecashaddrjs/README.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 ↗ | (On Diff #52412) | Yeah I'm not sure what 'original' means here. |
| modules/ecashaddrjs/README.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 ↗ | (On Diff #52412) | Well if you look at the things being linked in the original vs. the new link, it's totally different docs. |
Comment Actions
Revert link update in the ecashaddrjs README
| modules/ecashaddrjs/README.md | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 ↗ | (On Diff #52412) | OK reverted |