Can you change the title to indicate this is just a rename? It seemed to me as this would generalize behavior somehow (e.g. adding a generic param)
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Jan 14 2025
Jan 13 2025
Jan 4 2025
Jan 3 2025
Dec 20 2024
Dec 19 2024
Dec 18 2024
In D17269#394989, @Fabien wrote:What is the benefit vs a no-op ? Imagine I'm a mining pool and I want to convert all my miner addresses to legacy (real world use case) even if they are using BCH or XEC addresses. I would like to just use to_legacy() and not have to first check it's not legacy format already
Dec 16 2024
very cool!
Dec 15 2024
Dec 14 2024
Dec 13 2024
Dec 12 2024
Dec 11 2024
Dec 10 2024
@bot build-explorer
Dec 7 2024
@bot preview-explorer
Dec 6 2024
address review
@bot build-explorer
Dec 5 2024
fix CheckNegate
add rationales
Dec 4 2024
address review, remove CScriptNum10 and replace tests with tests that test the behavior of CScriptNum instead of testing whether it matches CScriptNum10
address review
The explorer build is failing (CI doesn't catch this yet):
Dec 3 2024
Dec 2 2024
works for me
Dec 1 2024
Generally I’m not sure if we should try to keep the interface the same. There’s an opportunity to simplify it (since users have to move to ecash-lib already anyway), and I think having just one encode/decode/Address will make the lib much easier to use
Nov 30 2024
@bot b58-ts-tests
- remove ecash-lib dev dependency
- coerce integer math, don't use Math.ceil
@bot b58-ts-tests
add tsconfig.build.json
Nov 29 2024
format comment
wait for the avalanche fix
forward process env
fix shasum calc
move doged download into the functional test