- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Thu, Mar 27
remove the set because it is not really needed
feedback
For this kind of log you should use LogPrintLevel(BCLog::AVALANCHE, BCLog::Level::Debug, "foo bar baz\n");
Wed, Mar 26
Update the name
In D17856#406854, @Klakurka wrote:Sorry - should be Shibusawa (last name).
Sorry - should be Shibusawa (last name).
$ date -ud @1763208000 sam. 15 nov. 2025 12:00:00 UTC
Tue, Mar 25
Added comments
change ordering
patch conditional rendering for test
Mon, Mar 24
Pushing up this last round of feedback-based changes to support incremental review, but this is not ready to land yet
Update interfaces, add some intermediate steps, take sighash as a param
Made change to how we handle status and ready to reduce indentation
Rebased
updated the link to the main XEC page instead of setup-guide
fix diff summary, implement review suggestion (return AbortNode....)
I think my summary (a copy paste of the initial message in the pull request) is misleading. The PR later change it's scope to make no change in behavior (besides additional logging) and basically just force future users of these functions to handle the return value.
I will fix this
Does this diff makes sense since there is no notification for the flush error like core (yet) ? We call AbortNode immediately upon error.
removed undesired brackets