- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Jun 26 2019
The whole thing doesn't actually test what we are interested in: that the node effectively have a good list of node to bootstrap from.
Jun 25 2019
Don't use 0 for flags.
OK I got back to it. I don't get the way things are split up. Why do this, which introduce a memory leak, and then do PR10587 to fix it? If the goal was to merge things so that we don't land bugs then what is it about? On the other hand, PR13291 was merged here, but clearly it is not bugfix. The logic of the decoupage do not seems to follow any principle.
Add test case from PR13805 and addres various comments
Rebase and address comments
Backport bugfix from PR13805
This is when I point out that CI dosn't run debug, or maybe it does, who knows. So I don't know if this is a giant regression or if the comment mention a fix that don't need fixing or what.
Jun 24 2019
Remove comment
Jun 23 2019
Jun 22 2019
Wait, does that pass IBD? There may be some problem with the sigops count. Please double check before landing.
Jun 21 2019
Rebase and remove redundant forward declaration