Additional test case also looks good. Accepting.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Jun 21 2017
Most likely needs changes after recent D230 changes.
The SimpleInitializeTest might be obsolete.
Please modify Test Plan to use the new name of the test (use Edit Revision to change).
Jun 20 2017
Tested, thanks for the fixes, extraction and cleanup, deadalnix.
General comment:
This task must wait until post release / fork.
Implement passing of OutputCheckers to initialize_chain() as requested by deadalnix
Jun 19 2017
Ran all extended regtests excluding pruning, all passed.
It looks ok to me, but I'd like another pair of eyes (or several) on this.
Tested ok, accepting.
Looks ok, but still need to run tests.
I'm accepting, since I think those doxygen comments can be repaired later, as well as the comment typo.
Will look at passing through OutputChecker object via initialize_chain().
just cleanups
Builds and passes make check, change looks sensible to me.
Fix nits spotted during self-check of Diff
Abandoned since superceded by D230 .
Updated on top of reformatted files
Abandoning this as I have a better fix implemented now (in final testing).
Ok, I will re-format and change comment style to be consistent with the file.
Could you please add a unit test for getSubVersionEB() .
This issue was most likely caused by a local configuration problem, therefore I am withdrawing the change.
Jun 18 2017
Jun 17 2017
Jun 16 2017
As discussed on Slack, it would be better to have the framework's node class deal with all aspects of collecting and verifying the stderr data.
The node class would be extended with methods to invoke stderr verification, but would do it on node stop in any case.
If mismatches between expected and present outputs are found, an exception would be raised to fail the test.
Minor fixes from self-review of diff on website
As discussed on Slack, this is being held back since current ABC code already has the feature to refuse >1MB blocks before the fork activation time, so it cannot nicely play on nolnet anymore.
All review comments addressed, accepting.
Just revert the Python wildcard import please, rest is fine.
Code changes look ok for current test, and I can accept on that basis.
Jun 15 2017
Ran the test on my Linux machine, it passed.
Fix up clang-style mess
Fix outdated -nolnet picked up by review
Jun 14 2017
Code comments updated by author via online discussion.
Please change test plan to run the '-extended' regression tests.
Changing block validity like this could impact the other tests.
Looks good to me, tests passed and I couldn't find meaningful cases missing.
No objections.
Tested ok for me on Linux, will put it through Travis to see about the Windows build.
Jun 13 2017
Rebased after submitting diffs to split out the clang-format changes
updated with review fixes
Fixes from review