update comment, second argument to execlp needs to be nonnull
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Feb 10 2020
Feb 9 2020
update comment
core dumping is working, so remove the manual trigger
also add -debug
try again
make core dump deliberately
reduce test overall time (don't need func tests)
In D5223#126124, @deadalnix wrote:I get what you want to do with this whole stack, and this is not a bad idea per, but you need to rework the approach so that flagset getting out of sync is less of a problem.
Hmm when you guys described moving the website into the repo I thought it was crazy as I was imagining something much bigger... this seems not so bad!
Feb 8 2020
In D5029#126007, @teamcity wrote:
address comments; simplify using D5220
Please rebase on master and run arc lint again, it may pick some things up in the functional test (more aggressive rules in place now).
rebase with test lint changes
(note that this also enabled W503, W504 which are disabled by default)
Feb 7 2020
(rebase)
(nb there have been a variety of intervening backports so it's not quite reading identically afterwards)
Hmm I guess one thing that could happen is if someone lands and the linting rules have since been restricted, then the rebase commit might have errors.
In D5196#125526, @Fabien wrote:This is strictly equivalent to running arc lint then arc land.
It applies to the current comment before the rebase. If there is no rebase conflict the risk that a new linter issue appear is very low.
Oh yeah good catch on those **< !
(from D4826)
I'm curious, supposing I'm on an old commit and the landing process needs to rebase me onto master, which state does it run lint on: the preland commit or the rebased commit?
This produces some lint advice (the only output right now if you run arc lint --everything)
@tobias_ruck please make sure to run arc lint before landing if you get a rebase conflict. Actually, preferably do arc diff on the conflict-resolved version just to make sure everything is happy.
In D5042#122099, @Fabien wrote:Increase log level from warning to message.
Make a test to fail intentionally to see how the CI reacts.
In D5180#125121, @Fabien wrote:That could be a linter
Feb 6 2020
TODO: make a test that probes virtualsize priorities using sigchecks