In src/tests/lcg.h it should pick up the same problem, does it?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
May 20 2019
rebased for D3071
Hey, just a heads up that this partly overlaps with D3021. Also when you're backporting things from Bitcoin Core, please make sure to mark them as backports and mention the PR number in the description.
relint
Does not actually depend on that...
nb: needs to be re-linted apparently
May 19 2019
rebased & separated out config removal into D3070
rebase
May 16 2019
OK :)
May 14 2019
In D3014#71749, @deadalnix wrote:Please write a proper test plan.
rebase for retest (same random rpc_listtransactions.py failure occured earlier in D2750)
update per Fabien comments
In D3026#71602, @Fabien wrote:Clearing my queue, see D3035
May 13 2019
rebase ; change casting style per comments
rebase
In D3013#71477, @schancel wrote:Okay, I see. That's weird -- still not sure *toJSON functions should go there, but okay.
Ah I see the extra clause is the fix you mention.
Which one should we do? ( D3026 ) 馃槀
In D3013#71320, @schancel wrote:I think more and more stuff should be better organized. Core doesn't seem to care about separating stuff out much.
However, this is just my opinion. It seems Amaury shared it. I hope we don't prevent ourself from making needed organizational changes indefinitely because of backports.
add static
In D3013#71305, @schancel wrote:I think these should be left in place.
May 12 2019
move release notes into main doc
May 11 2019
Note 13197 should be backported fairly soon too (T650)
May 10 2019
Looks good, thanks!
fix oopsie noticed by Jason
update per Jason comments
Due to divergent histories, the blockchain_tests affected in original PR do not exist yet in ABC; this will be fixed in child diff (D3012)
rebase onto D3021
note: TxToJSON is not in blockchain.cpp and doesn't need to be in a header either
rebase onto 10095 backport
T648 too
still exists in this form in Core.
rebase ; braces
May 9 2019
I see, you mean that D1049 backported PR11022 already?