There is no name collision, because this is what it is.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 2 2019
Oct 1 2019
rebase
Out of my queue
Part of the PR are missing.
test plan.
Test plan.
Add one missed removal of FLATDATA
rebase
Sep 28 2019
Splitting the script diff part would make this way easier to review.
This patch contains at least one serious blunder. In addition, the fact that the blunder passed through shows that the test plan is inadequate.
I have no idea what's happening on CI, none of this is reproducing outside of CI.
try more shit
The test plan is not appropriate.
Try something
Sep 27 2019
I'm not talking about tests. Glancing quickly at net_processing.cpp, I found cases that would benefit from the same type of refactoring as done here that are not part of the orginal PR because the corresponding code doesn't exist in Core.
This seems to me to be gratuitously moving away from core for no good reason. What's the reason?
Full PR
This seems to be redundant now.
Do you have some feedback from stackoverflow that this is not an appropriate place?
There are several extra calls to Misbehaving from our codebase that require updating.
Description
Then contacting people to get them to upgrade seems like the actual path forward rather than stepping back.
Sep 26 2019
Please go over the file and add proper annotations instead of simply doing ssh over phabricator.
Sep 24 2019
Clearly this patch wasn't adapted appropriately to our codebase.
The test plan is not apropriate. You need to test with clang to make sure the thread anotation are repsected, (gcc doesn't support this) and run the test suite on a debug build to check that AssertLockHeld doesn't trigger.