Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Apr 9 2019
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
The Qt5Widgets_UIC_EXECUTABLE variable is set by the find_package(Qt5Widget) which is searching for files according to the CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH.
The platform files override the CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH variable, so that cross compilation and gitian builds should be fine.
This also depends on T569.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Fixed comment format.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Rebase and test without D2645 as a dependency
Is that possible to remove the dependency from that test so that it test current behavior, then add the change required to the test to test the new behavior in D2645 ? This way it is very apparent what behavior is changed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Fix typo in release notes
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing failed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Remove chain.h as an include from validation.h
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Apr 8 2019
Duplicate of https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/T417
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
D2777 doesn't adequately provide test coverage for this change. I will need to continue investigating to see why this is the case.
In D2777#65449, @deadalnix wrote:The test case do not seem to be corresponding to the modified code (which is an assertion failing).
In D2645 , you state that there is a bug fix related to that test case, and that this is why the code isn't like in the backport but it is still unclear what the bug is, what fixes it and if the test is actually testing anything.
It shouldn't be difficult to have the bug fix coming with the test as one diff, or have an explanation as to why this isn't possible in the diff.
In the current form, there are no way to review this reliably.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Removed assert which appears to be useless now.
You will end up using the ui generator from the system even when not wanted (for instance for reproducible builds) with that construct.
Remove unnecessary setting of blocksize
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing passed.
Build Bitcoin-ABC / Diffs / Bitcoin-ABC Diff Testing started.
Rebase